![]() Likewise the objection will be raised that he can will nothing for another since that other is free in all circumstances men are always disclosing being, in Buchenwald as well as in the blue isles of the Pacific, in hovels as well as in palaces something is always happening in the world, and in the movement of keeping being at a distance, can one not consider its different transformations with a detached joy, or find reasons for acting? No solution is better or worse than any other. If every man is free, he can not will himself free. But we shall find here the same objection that we met when we examined the abstract moment of individual ethics. ![]() He must disclose the world with the purpose of further disclosure and by the same movement try to free men, by means of whom the world takes on meaning. This means that, through this world, each individual can give his freedom a concrete content. It is a speaking world from which solicitations and appeals rise up. ![]() ![]() The world in which he engages himself is a human world in which each object is penetrated with human meanings. Thus, every man has to do with other men. Simone de Beauvoir 1947 III The Positive Aspect of Ambiguity ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |